AP: James Earl Carter (ex president of one term, rejected overwhelmingly by the american people), a Nobel Peace Prize winner who was addressing a human rights conference in Ireland, said the Bush administration's refusal to accept Hamas' 2006 election victory was "criminal."
Moron, if it was accepted in the way you mean, it means that Israel might as well WIPE the palestinian people off the map, since they would have voted for unending war with the PEOPLE of Israel by voting for ITS destruction as the primary function of government. Yet just as the 'father of the Islamic Republic of Iran' missed the first time around, the consequences of american action or inaction seems to be something J Carter NEVER gets right.
AP continues: Carter said Hamas, besides winning a fair and democratic mandate that should have entitled it to lead the Palestinian government, had proven itself to be far more organized in its political and military showdowns with Abbas' moderate Fatah movement.
Did he just argue for brute force as a moral argument?
"Khomeini will eventually be hailed as a saint."
Andrew Young, J Carter 's appointed Ambassador to the UN
Continue reading "Sorry, he's not functionally anti-semitic, he's insane" »
2 comments:
Carter is the traitor by whom all other traitors to the Christian West shall be judged, but he's running scared........Islam has a new hero.
All hail the new Saladin.
The Great Cleanser of Dar Al Islam.
The Great Vanquisher of Christians and Jews.
Destroyer of the Infidel Republic.
Uniter of the Ummah!
Epa,
Yes he did argue for brute force as being the arbitrer of moral argument. Additionally, what Carter is saying is that Hamas coup d'etat in Gaza is "Democracy" fulfilled.
Post a Comment