Tuesday, July 10, 2007

"Time Running Out For Iran Strike"


I would have thought we'd all have reached this conclusion a long time ago. I hope this man's words reflects some sort of change in Western leadership:


Predicting that sanctions will ultimately fail to stop Teheran's nuclear program, (Pastorius note: Gee, really? Who woulda thunk?) Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, former head of Military Intelligence's Research Division, told The Jerusalem Post on Monday that time to launch an effective military strike against Iran's nuclear installations was running out.

According to Kuperwasser, who stepped down from his post last year, Iran is "very close" to the point that it will cross the technological threshold and have the capability to enrich uranium at an industrial level. Once they master the technology, the Iranians will have the ability to manufacture a nuclear device within two to three years, he added.

(Pastorius note: It seems to me everyone has been saying "two to three years" for at least two to three years now. I'm sick of this. Let's get on with the show, or fact that we will have the apocalypse on our hands.)

"The program's vulnerability to a military operation is diminishing as time passes," Kuperwasser said, "and they are very close to the point that they will be able to enrich uranium at an industrial level."

Report: Iranian general providing top intel. to US

In an article entitled "Halting Iran's Nuclear Weapons Program: Iranian Vulnerabilities and Western Policy Options" published this week by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs - run by former Israeli ambassador to the UN Dr. Dore Gold - Kuperwasser spells out what he believes is the only course of action that will stop Iran's race to nuclear power.

Thanks to technological sophistication, advances in producing raw materials as well as intermediate products and the improvement in protection of the program's components, the Western world is beginning to find it difficult to plan an effective strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, he said.

On Monday, The Washington Post revealed new satellite photos of Iran's enrichment facility at Natanz which showed the digging of a tunnel that analysts said could be used to hide and protect key nuclear components.

Iran, Kuperwasser said, was working on two parallel tracks - one at Natanz to enrich uranium and the plutogenic track being worked on at the Arak heavy water facility.

As long as Russia was not aligned with the United States, Kuperwasser said sanctions would not work on their own to stop Iran.

(Pastorius note: And, of course, Russia is selling them the nuke plants and the parts, for God's sake. Sanctions are a charade.)

"For significant sanctions to be effective the world needs to at the same time threaten the use of military force," he said. "Iran needs to be made to understand that if the sanctions won't work, the world is prepared to use military force to stop the nuclear program."

He said Iran was preparing for the possibility of war, but that deep down the Islamic leadership did not believe that either the United States or Israel were in a position of strength that would enable them to launch such a complicated military operation.

Iran, he said, was purchasing Russian air defense systems and was fortifying its nuclear facilities and moving key elements to underground bunkers in preparation for the possibility that its assessments were wrong and it would in the end be attacked.

"The Iranians are working around the clock on improving military capabilities and they are also moving centrifuges to underground facilities," he said.

Kuperwasser said that a real threat of military action - backed up by credible threats by world leaders as well as the deployment of a large military force to the region - could have the right effect in deterring Iranian leaders from continuing with their nuclear program.

A credible military threat combined with economic leverage had a chance at preventing the need for a future clash with a nuclear Iran and perhaps could also make it unnecessary to deal today with an Iran that is close to nuclearization, he said.


Bullshit. Sanctions will not work. They are deadset on this course of action. They, like North Korea, have proven they don't mind pissing off their people in order to make this goal happen. When the people have risen up, the government simply arrests, beats, kills, and tortures them.

Sanctions didn't work on Saddam Hussein, and they went on for 12 years. When have sanctions ever worked? Answer me.

In further news, the United States Navy has just sent another aircraft carrier into the waters off Iran:


MANAMA (Reuters) - The U.S. navy has sent a third aircraft carrier to its Fifth Fleet area of operations, which includes Gulf waters close to Iran, the navy said on Tuesday.

Enterprise (aircraft carrier) provides navy power to counter the assertive, disruptive and coercive behaviour of some countries, as well as support our soldiers and marines in Iraq and Afghanistan," a U.S. Navy statement said.

The move comes weeks after a flotilla of U.S. warships sailed through the narrowest point in the Gulf to hold exercises off Iran's coast in a major show of force.

Tension over Tehran's nuclear ambitions has raised regional fears of a military confrontation. Recent U.S. naval presence in the Gulf has been the largest since the 2003 Iraq war.

The Fifth Fleet area of operations includes the Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman and parts of the Indian Ocean.

11 comments:

Wild Bill said...

A plan to blockade shippin and maybe strike their petrol production is the only way I see us doin anythang to really do any good in Iran..

Food shortages, power outages, and havin to walk everywhere is a good way to get our point across to Iran !!

Israel turns dirtbags, mass murderers, and sadistic killers back into the terrorist network and all-the-while calls for the U.S. to whoop Iran's ass .. The logic in that has failed me and yet the Israelis still cling to Olmert..

My impression is that maybe when Israel gets serious then maybe the U.S. will get serious.. Israel still keeps usin the same ol tired, failed tactics of the past, so whats so bad about the U.S. doin the same ??

Pastorius said...

Wild Bill,
I always like your logic, but this time I fail to understand it.

It seems to me you are saying, if Israel jumps off the Empire State Building, then we should too.

Michael Travis said...

"Iran needs to be made to understand that if the sanctions won't work, the world is prepared to use military force to stop the nuclear program."

Iran and the entire Muslim world needs to be made to understand that threatening the West will lead to the swift and absolute destruction of your nation, its "Holy places" and culture...........followed by a return to the stone age. Any complaints or protests afterwards should be answered by the destruction of Mecca and Medina...and the expulsion of Muslims from the occupied lands of North Africa and Near Asia.

This will produce a real peace.

(The US Carrier group is in preparation for the withdrawal)

[Real] Peace

Wild Bill said...

What I'm sayin, Pas, is that I'm gettin tired of Israel standin behind us sayin "sic em" ..

This release of terrorist prisoners by Israel just reminds me of Mohamad Atta.. He was also a prisoner of Israel till Slick and Madeline Halfbright demanded their release..

As much as that info has been passed around the same ol "give till it hurts(or kills)" mentality pervades even till today without any accountability..

Israel is gonna release 250 of the most sadistic dirtbag sunzabithes breathin Mid East oxygen and yet wants us to attack Iran.. Just dont make any fuggin sense to me..

Pastorius said...

Gotcha!

What you say makes perfect sense.

And, you know what I'm sick of? I'm sick of hearing George Bush say, "All options are on the table."

Pastorius said...

Michael,
I hope you're wrong, but I fear you are right.

Michael Travis said...

Israel's release of the terrorist prisoners has taken place because we do not have a PM with the eggs to say Fuck off to Bush & Condi..who have insisted on it. Shamir was the last PM to put Israel first.

By the way..."All options are on the table has been the US response to every suggestion that the US should consider "Military intervention" against Israel, in support of Madrid, Arafat, the Road Map..etc.

The US has never taken up arms in support of Israel....however, as Pastorious knows...we, Israel, have done the deed for the USA several times.

I don't want to waste space here...so just check out my recent posts on the IBA.

PEACE

Pastorius said...

Michael,
Thanks for providing a bit of perspective.

However, at the same time, I think it was clear last summer that Bush was signaling to Olmert that he had the ok to go after Syria and Iran, and Olmert chose to keep the war small.

I think that was Western Civ's last chance. After this, the next stop is nukes.

Fucking pathetic.

Always On Watch said...

Pastorius,
After this, the next stop is nukes.

God help us. Some kind of nuke attack will wake the rest of those worth waking up.

I saw those maps in the WaPo. Put me into a funk. I noted little coverage of the same on the news. Maybe I missed it?

Michael Travis said...

What I'm sayin, Pas, is that I'm gettin tired of Bush standin behind us sayin "sic em" ..

We'll get that shit no matter which way we go.....on the other hand, even the traitor Olmert would never dream of not responding to an attack such as the WTC/9-11 raids. Bush still has not taken any steps against those countries (Saudi Arabia & UAE) EXCEPT for paying the BILLIONS of dollars.

Pastorius said...

AOW,
I haven't seen those maps.

Could you send me a link?

Michael,
I understand, and I am not arguing with you. I am simply saying, I believe there are multiple streams flowing from the White House. What you are classifying as "Bush" is, of course, the Bush Administration.

I believe George Bush, the individual was itching for the fight against Syria and Iran. If Olmert would have been successful in starting it, I believe Bush believed he would have been justified in backing it up.

I am not the only person who believes that that was what was going on.

Ask Pamela. She believes that, and so do people she knows.