Saturday, February 07, 2009

First They Came for the Second Amendment. . .

"The only reason for guns in civilian hands is for sporting purposes. " -- Sarah Brady , Jackson, Keeping the Battle Alive, Tampa Trib., Oct. 21, 1993 (interview with Sarah Brady).

(note: original quote removed. As Pasto points out in comments it is of questionable veracity. We gun owners have enough trouble without using lies, knowingly or otherwise, to support our fight. If further interested in the campaign against guns try this: http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcnobody.html
Thanks for the heads up, Pastorius)

Remember that as we enter thse dark times. It's not just the First Amendment at risk. It's all of them. And the Second Amendment was put there to protect the others. The Founders knew the risk of a disarmed populace, knew that an armed population would help keep a government from running amuck.

With that in mind, a recent clip of Rahmadan E. Start with one list, others will follow. And who decides who goes on that or any other list and why? Wonder if anyone told Biden they'll be coming for his Purdeys, too, at some point?

First spotted at The Breda Fallacy:


Egads can they be any more blatant?

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

At 1:14 Rahm states : "If you are on the no-fly list because you are known as - may be - a possible terrorist - YOU CANNOT BUY A HANDGUN IN AMERICA."



DEFINE "TERRORIST".

DEFINE "POSSIBLE TERRORIST".

Do you trust Rahm Emmanuel to define it?

Do you trust Obama to define it?

Do you trust MC PC liberal congress to define it?

If a "possible terrorist" is on a "no-fly" list, why is this individual granted citizenship? Rahm Emmanuel states that "if your name exists on that no-fly list . . .you're not part of the American family and don't deserve that right. There is no 'right' for you if you are on that terrorist list"

Now why don't I believe him? They won't deport illegals that continue to commit the crimes he refers to. They prefer to give blanket amnesty.

Insert string of profanity here.

midnight rider said...

Thank you, Anonymous. My point exactly.

Just Cause said...

Just look at what Gordon Brown is doing to us at the moment - there's no way that he or the Labour government would have sold us out to Europe if gun ownership was the norm over here.

An unarmed populace, a 'civilian' militia with a sworn allegience to the President (SA, SS, Brownshirts anyone?), a socialist in power - a recipe for disaster if ever I heard one. 10th September is about right, but 10th September 1938!

Damien said...

midnight rider,

When will people get the message that gun control does not work?

midnight rider said...

Not soon enough I'm afraid, Damien.

Free men own guns, slaves do not. To enslave a nation disarm the population.

Wish I could remember where I read that.

Pastorius said...

MR,
I'm 95% sure that quote is not real:

http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcbogus_brady.html

midnight rider said...

Pasto -- you would appear correct. Quote removed and replaced. Thank you.

midnight rider said...

The Rahm video is too sadly real, however.

Pastorius said...

Yep. Sadly, or should I say frighteningly.

midnight rider said...

Both.