Saturday, January 01, 2011

QUESTION: “Why doesn’t Obama just release his birth certificate?”. ANSWER: There is something embarrassing to him politically that’s written on it

His race is listed as Caucasian-Arab on the birth certificate, not as “black” the way he needs it to be to get away with everything he gets away with in life?

From Hill Buzz:
Yesterday, on Hardball, Chris Matthews asked a very obvious, rhetorical question: ”Why doesn’t Obama just release his birth certificate?”.

ANSWER: Because there is something embarrassing on it politically for Obama that he doesn’t want to have to explain to the American people, and the black community in particular.I used to think he was listed as “Muslim” on his birth certificate, but I’ve since been convinced that in 1961, when Obama was born, religion wasn’t recorded on a birth certificate.But, there’s something on his birth certificate he does not want America to see, and it’s now down to a few options as to what that something is: 





Read the rest of the story here.

The REAL mystery of all of this, at the moment, is why on Earth Chris Matthews decided to talk about this last night on MSNBC.

15 comments:

Silverfiddle said...

I don't think there's anything embarrassing or incriminating at all.

I think this is kook bait.

Pastorius said...

Really?

I don't believe this story.

I do, however, believe it is HIGHLY possible that his religion was listed as Muslim on his birth certificate.

The other possibility is that Obama has played this as bait the entire time. That is also HIGHLY possible.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

I agree, Obama is not stupid and probably realizes that he can use the kooks to tar his more rational opponents, plus if there was anything to the claim that he was not born in the U.S, under the American constitution, it would not be legal for him to run for president, so most likely Hillery would have jumped on it, since it would have left the door open for her. Obama most likely was born in the U.S, since that's were his certificate of live birth says he was born, but there still maybe something that his birth certificate says that he finds embarrassing or he thinks could hurt him politically.

Alexander Münch said...

Pasto,

The QUESTION & the ANSWER on top, do not bother me too much.

If, I repeat IF, there was something 'Non Kosher' in the process of Obama's election and/or the ceremony on the "Hill" before he took the job as the 44th POTUS then :-

1 - The 'Takiyya' started many years ago with a long range VISION of its outcome!

2 - This kind of a PLOT couldn't have been performed by one person alone! There must be a Mega Organization behind it, and a lot of "Latent Shtinkers" from the inside !

3 - The "Fact Finding Inquiry" is FBI's, CIA's and Senate's job to do ! And it had to be done the day Obama set his foot into politics !!! And what if they haven't ? Huh?...

If only one item from the three mentioned above is correct, then WE ALL better start sleeping in shifts !

Alex.
.

Anonymous said...

JANUARY 1, 2011
REMEMBER PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON AND HIS
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS?

PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WOULD HAVE
BEEN IMPEACHED A LONG TIME AGO IF HE
WAS A WHITE MAN.

The more "Birthers" are ignored, the more their requests
for information are refused,
the stronger is their case
that fraudulent concealment of material facts
is going on, and on and on.

Remember President Richard Nixon?

The new Hawaiian Governor allegedly claims he remembers
parties back when President Obama was a baby which his
parents took him to.

Well, why would the Governor, who is 72 years old, recall
parties of any particular summer so long ago?

Well, in Hawaii in the summer of 1959 there were parties
because on Aug. 21, 1959 Hawaii became a State of the U.S.A.

Now, look at President Obama's birth certificate. In the lower
right hand corner in tiny print are H.R.S. codes. If you read
these Hawaii Revised Statutes you will see that one of them
is subject to the requirements of more of them. All together,
they absolutely prove that this birth certificate was amended
and or altered.

It is quite possible that President Obama was born Aug. 4, 1959
rather than Aug. 4, 1961, and the birth certificate was amended
and altered to change the year so that he would appear to be
a natural born citizen.

President Nixon was impeached for fraud. Let's get the facts
that are currently being covered up, the original long form birth
certificate which will prove which facts were altered and/or amended
on President Obama's birth certificate.

Was President Obama really born before Hawaii officially
became a State of the United States?

The birth certificate President Obama has provided for the public
viewing is a laser copy, see lower left hand corner. There were
no laser printers in 1961.

If President Obama was born in 1959 then astrologically he would have
four positions in Leo. If he was born in 1961 he would have 2 positions
in Leo. Astrologically, have more leaders had more Leo positions?
If President Obama was born in 1961 then he has three cusp positions
which make a person intelligent. Intelligence is required to pull off a
good cover-up scheme if he was not born in Hawaii.

Go to the State of Hawaii online and read the Hawaii Revised Statutes
for certificates of birth, and for birth certificates, and for certification
of live birth.

It's like searching for marijuana in the United States Code.
Some of the laws are under the word, "marijuana", and some
of the laws are under the word, "marihuana". If you don't look
for both marijuana and marihuana
you won't know all of the laws we are subject to.

Keep in mind, that of the H.R.S. codes shown in tiny print in the
lower right hand corner of Obama's birth certificate, one of them
is subject to the requirements of more H.R.S. codes, so follow the
trail and you'll read the proof that this certificate was amended
and/or altered, which is why the H.R.S. codes are legal notices, legally
required to be printed on the birth certificate to warn and inform
you that it has been altered and/or amended.

http://USMJP.com UNITED STATES MARIJUANA PARTY
VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2012

Alexander Münch said...

Ano,

WOW !

Thanks for the educational lesson !

Alex.

Always On Watch said...

I used to think that BHO's refusal to show that birth certificate was kook bait.

But the kook-bait thing has drawn on too long, IMO.

"Father unknown" (or a different listed father) would be problematic -- no matter who BHO's father was. BHO made such a big splash with Dreams of My Father. If the book was some sort of fraud and BHO knowingly perpetrated that fraud, BHO's halo would slip some more.

I think that it is possible that BHO's mother didn't know who the father of her baby was.

Pastorius said...

My mother in law was born in Hawaii in the late 30's.

That makes her a "Natural Born Citizen" of the USA.

Such citizenship was granted retroactively when we made Hawaii a state.

Try again.

The Anti-Jihadist said...

Good fact checking, Pastorius.

Plus, what the hell is the mention of 'marihuana' doing on this thread anyways?

Being blatantly off topic, the failure to fact check (inexcusable in the era of pervasive Google) and pushing (at best) questionable political/social agendas like legalized 'marihuana' might have something to do why the 'birthers' are stuck on the margins of the American political scene.

If any birthers out there reading this want to win my vote, so to speak, try sticking to the aforementioned rules of engagement. Might do wonders.

Always On Watch said...

At this thread, I read the following:

beamish said...

Who cares what the damned thing says? Obama's half-sister, born in Indonesia, also has a Hawaiian certificate of live birth as well.

Why don't we honor his parents and look at the only qualifications that natter? His father was a Kenyan national, his mother wasn't old enough to confer US citizenship to a child of a foreign national under naturalization law at the time, even if he's a Messiah capable of the miracle of being born in Hawaii at two different hospitals while being born in Kenya in front of witnesses at the same time.

Have the Guvnah dig up the US Constitution and see what it says.
December 29, 2010 3:17 AM

True or not?

Pastorius said...

AJ,
Well put.

I didn't like the Marijuana thing either. But, I decided to leave it alone.

You're right, it has nothing to do with anything, and it does make the guy look very marginal.

Pastorius said...

AOW,
What does the Constitution say about the age of the mother being a requirement for citizenship?

Always On Watch said...

Pastorius,
Start by seeing THIS.

The matter isn't in the Constitution but has to do with INS rules.

SamenoKami said...

One rumor is that Odama's mom claimed her half-brother as her own to cover up her father's transgression and Odama is the product of an affair between Stanley the father/grandfather and some black hooker.
Odama's grandfather raised his own son along w/Odama's typical white grandmother.
Stanley (?) the mom interestingly enough has a lot convincing stuff in her background to make her CIA.
During the '08 election run up I looked at the birth cert. as a 'nothing' thrown out by Odama's people to draw attention away from the more serious commie-lib leanings of Odama during the campaign.
I wondered if Frank M. Davis were not the father since he took nudie piks of Odama's mom.
I'm still not in favor of impeachment if Odama's found to be not qualified to be POTUS. Let him finish out his one term (being ineligible for a 2nd) and rescind all his commie-lib legislation and go on. From that point on the first thing done to run for POTUS is to present a valid birth cert.
No one in America has enough ammo and food stored to ride out the riots after an impeachment. That's not counting the fact that you wouldn't be able to go to work.

Always On Watch said...

I agree with SamenoKami:

No one in America has enough ammo and food stored to ride out the riots after an impeachment.