Saturday, April 13, 2013

Abortionist Slit Necks Of Babies Born Alive In Front Of Teenage Employee, Told Assistant, “That’s What You Call A Chicken With Its Head Cut Off”


From CNS News:

According to a Pennsylvania grand jury, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, the wealthy Philadelphia abortionist now on trial for seven counts of murdering babies who had survived his late-term abortions, repeatedly sliced the necks of born babies in front of a teenage employee, and once told his long-time assistant (the teenager’s mother) that a writhing born baby whose neck he had just severed was like a “chicken with its head cut off.” 
“Ashley Baldwin also saw Gosnell slice the neck of moving and breathing babies,” said the report of the grand jury that recommended charging Gosnell with multiple counts of murder. 
Baldwin’s mother, Tina, worked for nine years as Gosnell’s assistant. The teenager herself went to work for the abortionist when she was a 15-year-old high school sophomore.

5 comments:

jeppo said...

Pasto, here is an interview with Jack Buckby, leader of the National Culturists in the UK.

It's astonishing to see how these people look up to John Press like an intellectual guru, almost like a cult leader. Hey, more power to him, lol.

Buckby seems a bit more hardcore than Press, which is a good thing IMO. He's a former member of the BNP and freely admits that race is an integral part of culture.

The interview links to the National Culturists website, where there are a bunch of interesting articles by Press and others. They seem like a very organized and professional outfit.

Buckby says that Press now writes exclusively for them. Is that why he doesn't post here anymore?

Pastorius said...

You know, I truly do think John Press is "an intellectual guru".

I have been telling him, since Culturism first came out and I read it, and interviewed him on my radio show, that he has come up with something truly new and important, and he may go down in history for it. Certainly, he deserves to do so.

In the UK, race has always been part of culture. In the United States, it is not in the same way, or to the same extent, as it is in the UK.

I think it is a tremendous mistake for anyone to conflate Race and Culture. It is not accurate and it is not a winning strategy.

As I have said before, Culture is a set of ideas which can be codified in language. If people are taught these ideas from the beginning of life, through their schooling, and into the Unitersity, they will be "indoctrinated" into a Culture.

The Left, evil as it is, is proof that what I say is true.

The Left teaches black people, Hispanics, and others to believe in homosexuality and abortion as part of their racist (special interest/identity groups) agenda.

The people buy it.

One thing I think you and I can agree on, however, is this:

The English have built all of the world's greatest nations.

The UK
USA
Australia
Canada
New Zealand

and even

India.

Those who want to denigrate the culture of "Dead White Men" are complete and utter fucking fools.

The white men created everything in life those assholes love; their iPods, their destops, the internet, the meds that keep them healthy and alive, the ways of farming and cultivating food which keep them fed and fat, the cool cars they get to drive, the cool music and the tech to deliver it, IT'S ALL FROM THE CULTURE OF AMERICA, THE UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, ETC.

Every fucking bit of it.

I wish all the Leftist assholes who denigrate the culture of the "Dead White Men" would have to go live in the culture of the third world misogynists and racists they love to hold up; those noble savages, those proletariat, etc.

the people they believe are the future are only the future to the extent that they adopt the culture of the "Dead White Men".

If they don't, then they will destroy the system that keeps us, and the world will descend into a New Dark Age.

jeppo said...

I have been telling him, since Culturism first came out and I read it, and interviewed him on my radio show, that he has come up with something truly new and important, and he may go down in history for it. Certainly, he deserves to do so.

I agree 100%. Coming up with an original political philosophy is no easy feat. The fact that it's finally getting widespread publicity is fantastic, and John deserves all the acclaim he is getting. I hope that National Culturist groups are eventually established in the US, Canada and elsewhere.

In the UK, race has always been part of culture. In the United States, it is not in the same way, or to the same extent, as it is in the UK.

The big difference is that indigenous Brits are white while indigenous Americans are not. But the United States was undoubtedly founded as a white republic, and through its citizenship and immigration policies it remained that way up to about 1965.

I think it is a tremendous mistake for anyone to conflate Race and Culture. It is not accurate and it is not a winning strategy.

I would say that the 3 main building blocks of culture are race, religion and language. If we totally divorce race from culture, how can we explain the differences between Detroit and Windsor, or Kingston Ontario and Kingston Jamaica, or New Zealand and New Guinea, or San Diego and Tijuana?

As I have said before, Culture is a set of ideas which can be codified in language. If people are taught these ideas from the beginning of life, through their schooling, and into the Unitersity, they will be "indoctrinated" into a Culture.

Blacks have been indoctrinated into American culture for 400 years now. How's that working out? There are significant genetic differences between population groups that cannot be erased through any amount of education or indoctrination.

The white men created everything in life those assholes love; their iPods, their destops, the internet, the meds that keep them healthy and alive, the ways of farming and cultivating food which keep them fed and fat, the cool cars they get to drive, the cool music and the tech to deliver it, IT'S ALL FROM THE CULTURE OF AMERICA, THE UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA, ETC.

Charles Murray in his 'Human Accomplishment' (great book BTW) calculated that Europeans and North Americans are responsible for 97% of the world's scientific discoveries and inventions over the past 500 years. White men invented the modern world and virtually everything in it.

I wish all the Leftist assholes who denigrate the culture of the "Dead White Men" would have to go live in the culture of the third world misogynists and racists they love to hold up; those noble savages, those proletariat, etc.

Instead of moving to the Third World, they are importing it into the West en masse. Destroying European Christian civilization is their goal and, alas, they are succeeding.

If they don't, then they will destroy the system that keeps us, and the world will descend into a New Dark Age.

Even if the West goes down through Leftist subversion from within and mass Third World immigration from without, I believe that higher civilization will survive in the Far East, namely China, Japan and Korea.

They are the only non-European peoples with the intellectual wherewithal to create and maintain First World societies. Provided, of course, that they don't make the same mistakes as we have. But I don't think they will because they value unity, not diversity. They are culturists, not multiculturalists.

Pastorius said...

Jeppo,
You write: Charles Murray in his 'Human Accomplishment' (great book BTW) calculated that Europeans and North Americans are responsible for 97% of the world's scientific discoveries and inventions over the past 500 years. White men invented the modern world and virtually everything in it.


I respond: Yeah, I believe it. I've never thought it through. But I'm glad someone did.

There you go.

That's what those dumb multiculturalist assholes want to throw away. Dumbfucks.


Jeppo says: Even if the West goes down through Leftist subversion from within and mass Third World immigration from without, I believe that higher civilization will survive in the Far East, namely China, Japan and Korea.

They are the only non-European peoples with the intellectual wherewithal to create and maintain First World societies. Provided, of course, that they don't make the same mistakes as we have. But I don't think they will because they value unity, not diversity. They are culturists, not multiculturalists.



I respond: Given all our history of disagreement, and my siding against your racial interpretation of history, I think you'll probably find it funny to hear me, essentially, agreeing with you on the idea that

1) white people invented 97% of the
and
2) expressing my anger at "multiculturalists" for wanting to destroy that world

and then

3) disagreeing with you that the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans have the ability to create and maintain "first world countries".

Here's why I don't agree with that last part:

CULTURE

They don't have the Culture.

The Culture we have is a Judeo-Christian Culture, which values facts (they value facts), learning ( they value learning) and INNOVATION (they do not value innovation.

They may learn to value innovation and creativity.

But, Chinese/Asian culture has been caught up in Buddhist/Taoist/Confucian thought for a long fucking time and they believe in tradition over innovation.

Or at least they always have.

Do you remember our old friend "Religion of Pieces", who also went by a series of other names over time?

That guy was a Buddhist. And, he used to get angry at me for saying that I though Buddhist culture was weak in it's foundation, and that it's thinking was necessarily anti-creativity, and always would be.

The only hope for the world, if it is Asia who saves us, it Korean, because Koreans are tough people, who are becoming Christian (in the non-denominational American sense) and they will become creative/innovative as a result.

jeppo said...

I agree that East Asians seem to lack the creative spark found in Europeans. Maybe this is because of the fatalistic nature of their Buddhist/Taoist/Confucianist philosophy, or maybe it's because their IQ bell curve is taller than ours: i.e. fewer geniuses and fewer dullards means there isn't a critical mass of extremely high IQ people who have historically been the great innovators in the West.

However, their culture (race + religion + language) is very adept at copying what is best in our culture. Look how successful the countries who have adopted our socioeconomic systems have become: Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore. There are no similar examples of this type of success found anywhere else in the world outside the West, probably because no one else can achieve it.

As for Christianity being the solution for East Asia, I think the jury's still out on that one. Though Christianity has made serious inroads in Korea and to a lesser extent China, it is barely existent in Japan. Yet they seem to be doing pretty well without it.

Anyway, the old, muscular Christianity of the West is pretty much dead. Modern Christianity seems to be mainly about redistributionist economics, non-discrimatory open borders and suicidal ecumenicalism. The brotherhood of man and all that jazz. Maybe Christianity contains within it the seeds of its own destruction. Or maybe we're just practicing it wrong.

Either way I wouldn't count the East Asians out, whatever their religion. Maybe we should start copying them instead of the other way around. They have a lot to teach us about cultural unity and civilizational pride, stuff we used to know but no longer do.