Barack Obama - DEFENDER, PROTECTOR of Iran and it’s interests. THAT’S HOW IT IS TODAY, Jan 16 2015

You can call this trying to protect negotiations all you want, but it demonstrates how far this naive, or dangerous fool has been negotiated into playing the appeaser of racist freaks. By any measure it is THEIR interests he protects for whatever reason he chooses to fool himself with.
National Journal (i.e. THE CENTER):

But the biggest moment of the presser was on Iran. Obama addressed the ongoing negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, and a bill that lawmakers are expected to introduce next month that would increase sanctions on the Iranian regime. It’s a bill the president says he will veto.
"Through some very strong diplomatic work, we united the world and isolated Iran. And it’s because of that work that we brought them to the negotiating table." But Obama is still putting the odds of a comprehensive agreement with Iran at "probably less than 50-50." Iran, he said, is run by a regime that "is deeply suspicious of the West, deeply suspicious of us."
Obama said new sanctions legislation would likely cause the negotiations to collapse. “And if that happens, there is no constraint on Iran at that point going back and doing exactly what it had been doing before they came to the table.”
He also said that if negotiations fail, the likelihood of military confrontation goes up, “and Congress will have to own that as well.”
For that reason, Obama said he plans to veto any new sanctions that come to his desk. Obama, in speaking with the Democratic congressional caucus yesterday, said, “I respectfully request them to hold off for a few months to see if we have the possibility of solving a big problem without resorting potentially to war. And I think that’s worth doing.”
Obama later clarified that if diplomacy doesn’t succeed now, the U.S. won’t be on “immediate war footing” with Iran.
Similarly, Cameron voiced his disagreement with new sanctions that could fracture negotiations with Iran, saying he spoke to U.S. senators during his visit to “simply make a point.”

They have all become Stanley Baldwin

1. Baldwin did nothing about German rearmament (nb Hitler’s big rally 1935)
   
2. He did nothing when Hitler invaded the Rhineland (March 1936)
   
3. Baldwin was sympathetic to the fascists in the Spanish Civil War in 1936 – he persuaded 27 countries to sign a Non-Intervention Pact (and then stood by and watched as Hitler and Mussolini ignored it and sent military support to Franco).
   
4. He openly said that he would not go to war: "With two lunatics like Mussolini and Hitler you can never be sure of anything. But I am determined to keep the country out of war." (April 1936)
   
5. He did not want to spend the sums necessary to rearm.
   
6. Like many Conservatives, he feared Communism, and rather hoped Hitler would stop the advance of Communist Russia.
   
7. He knew that the British people would not accept war.   Later, he said:"Supposing I had gone to the country and said that Germany was rearming, and that we must rearm, does anybody think that this pacific democracy would have rallied to that cry at that moment? I cannot think of anything that would have made the loss of the election from my point of view more certain.
   

Self deception and delusion AT BEST.
Dangers to their democracies.
Either way fools of the highest order, morphed into protectors of those who will never give in to any blandishment to make safe their theocratic and racist govt via nuclear weapons.
As in all history before, it will always lead to war. This time, NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE and history will lay the blame at the feet of these men, AND THOSE WHO CHOSE THEM FREELY.
NOT ME. 53% OF THE USA.